Track star suffers faceplant fallTrack star suffers faceplant fall Video game lets golfers kill deerVideo game lets golfers kill deer Everyone fooled by Lacrosse trick playEveryone fooled by Lacrosse trick play
Most popular articles
$10,000 up for grabsSign-up for NRL, AFL
and Rugby tipping
Sports Illustrated: behind the scenes with Ronda RouseySports Illustrated: behind the scenes with Ronda RouseyIn his first official statement since testing positive to steroids yesterday, UFC superstar Anderson Silva plans to fight the 'allegations' against him. 'I don’t like this fight. I don’t want to fight him,' says Arlovski on Browne clash 'I don’t like this fight. I don’t want to fight him,' says Arlovski on Browne clash When former UFC middleweight champion Anderson Silva tested positive for anabolic steroids today, his entire legacy as a prize fighter was called into question. Aussie return: Kyle Noke books next fight at UFC AdelaideAussie return: Kyle Noke books next fight at UFC AdelaideAnderson Silva's doctor has said that the former UFC champion denies taking performance enhancing drugs, and wants to be tested again. UFC's Rousey scores the only free ticket to Mayweather vs. PacquiaoUFC's Rousey scores the only free ticket to Mayweather vs. PacquiaoBusted for PEDS today, you won't believe what former UFC champ Anderson Silva told Jon Jones (who recently tested positive to cocaine) at UFC 183. UFC queen Ronda Rousey lands starring role in action film 'Mile 22' UFC queen Ronda Rousey lands starring role in action film 'Mile 22' The MMA world is in shock after UFC 183 headliners Anderson Silva and Nick Diaz both tested positive to banned substances. Fighter reactions here. Bellator files court injunction to nix 'Rampage' Jackson's UFC return Bellator files court injunction to nix 'Rampage' Jackson's UFC return Both Anderson Silva and Nick Diaz have failed drug tests following UFC 184. Silva tested positive for an anabolic steroid, while Diaz tested for marijuana.
Wide World of Sports TV partners
Footy ClassifiedOur award winning panel tell it how it really is in the AFL world.AFL Footy ShowAustralia's favourite team takes you through the week in AFL.NRL Footy ShowFatty and the gang bring you an entertaining look at rugby league.Wide World of SportsCatch up with Ken Sutcliffe and the team on Wide World of Sports.
Gallen shocked at shoulder charge ban
By Ian McCullough
20:05 AEST Tue Nov 20 2012

NSW skipper Paul Gallen is shocked at the ARL Commission's decision to outlaw the shoulder charge and claims reducing the number of interchanges would have been a better step.

The commission reviewed a detailed report into the shoulder charge conducted by Sydney Roosters chief executive Brian Canavan and made the decision after a meeting on Tuesday.

It accepted a management recommendation that the increased size of players was creating a situation where the shoulder charge could lead to an unacceptable injury risk.

The review found that shoulder charges made up 0.05 per cent of the 142,355 tackles made in 2012, with less than four per cent resulting in injury to the attacking player and less than one per cent to the defensive player.

Seventeen per cent resulted in contact with the head of the attacking player.

"I'm still in shock," Gallen told Triple M radio.

"We don't want players getting hurt, but it's taking some of the toughness of the game."

"When you have a look at the highlight reels they're all big hits, the fans love shoulder charges."

Gallen said reducing the number of interchanges would make it harder for bigger players to produce so many huge hits.

"Personally I think it would change a lot of things," he said.

"If you have blokes who are 115-135 kilos scratching around, they would simply have to lose weight and become fitter.

"It will make the bigger men tired and certainly take the collisions out of the game.

"People are always complaining about the lack of halves and players not taking on the line, but when you're 85 kilos running at someone who is 130 kilos it is going to hurt, especially when they are fresh."

Gallen's Cronulla coach Shane Flanagan echoed his skipper's sentiments and said he was concerned at how the new ruling would be interpreted.

"It sounds easy but it's not," Flanagan told AAP.

"How are do they determine that a player wasn't affecting a tackle when his shoulder comes into contact with the head?

"This can happen sometimes when a player lowers his centre of gravity when running with the ball. I just want to know the difference between that and a shoulder charge."

Flanagan said reducing the interchange from 12 to eight would encourage more playmakers to come into the game.

"It would see more footballers who are not just athletes," he said.

"We are too athlete-based. We need to become more football-based. This would bring the smaller players back into the game and make fatigue more of a factor."

NRL interim chief executive Shane Mattiske said banning shoulder charges would reduce the potential risk of serious injury to players.

"The commission has gone through a thorough review process and been public in warning players about the risks of illegal play," Mattiske said.

"The report shows that the shoulder charge is not a significant part of the game and its removal is not likely to impact on the way the game is played.

"With the increase in size and strength of the players, we believe this is the time to eliminate a potential risk."

NRL general manager of football operations Nathan McGuirk will consult with the game's Competition Committee to finalise proposed rule amendments in relation to the shoulder charge.

The proposed rule amendments will be put before the commission at next month's meeting.